What does spirituality do?
Spirituality is often described by what it contains: beliefs, practices, experiences, identities, rituals or ideas about the sacred. Here I ask a different question: what is spirituality for? What does it do in a human life, and what may follow when that change begins to affect other people and the wider world?
The argument has two movements. The first is inward. Spirituality can support personal growth by helping a person become more present, regulated, coherent, imaginative and discerning. Taken together, these processes can support greater internal alignment: a closer correspondence between what a person perceives, feels, values, understands and does.
The second movement is outward. Spiritual growth places that increasingly integrated self within a larger horizon of relation, responsibility and care. Personal growth and spiritual growth therefore overlap, but they are not identical: personal growth moves inward towards integration; spiritual growth also moves outward towards relation.
What does spirituality do to the individual?
-
Presence is not the same as consciousness. A person can be conscious while distracted, anxious, ruminative or enclosed within habitual self-concern. Presence is a quality of attention and awareness: being more fully available to the body, breath, sensation, image, sound, another person, a landscape, grief, beauty or silence.
Prayer, meditation, contemplative looking, walking in nature, gardening, painting, yoga, ritual, dance, lovemaking and deep listening can all function as practices of presence. Their forms differ, but each can interrupt automaticity and return attention to lived experience.
-
Many practices associated with spirituality may help regulate affect, attention and the body. Meditation, prayer, breathwork, art-making, ritual, nature exposure, gardening and embodied movement can help some people move away from stress, rumination and sympathetic arousal towards greater grounding, calm and emotional regulation.
These effects should not be universalised: spiritual practices do not automatically reduce stress, and some practices can be activating or destabilising. The more defensible claim is functional. Regulation can create enough psychological and physiological space for a person to think, feel, process experience and relate with greater flexibility.
-
Spirituality can help people place suffering, mortality, aspiration and everyday life within a larger interpretive frame. Viktor Frankl is central to the idea of meaning as an existential orientation, especially under conditions of suffering. Clifford Geertz likewise shows how religious symbolic systems make the world interpretable by locating events within broader structures of significance.
Emily Esfahani Smith's four pillars of meaning - belonging, purpose, storytelling and transcendence - map particularly well onto this framework. Belonging concerns relation; purpose directs values towards action and service; storytelling allows people to organise identity and experience; transcendence situates the self within something larger than its immediate concerns.
-
Connection is one of the central functions of spirituality. It describes a movement beyond exclusive self-preoccupation towards greater participation in the world around us. Spirituality may help transcend the ego-bound self not by destroying the self, but by opening it to relation.
Elizabeth Drescher's research on the spiritual lives of the religiously unaffiliated is useful because it shows how spirituality is often lived through ordinary relationships and everyday practices rather than doctrine or dramatic spiritual experience. Her memorable 'Four Fs' - Family, Friends, Fido and Food - point to the significance of care, friendship, animals, shared meals and other ordinary practices of belonging and meaning.
McGilchrist's work is also useful here because of his distinction between modes of attention. A narrow, instrumental mode attends to what can be isolated, controlled or used, while a broader mode is more receptive to context, relationship, embodiment and the living whole. Spiritual practices may encourage this broader form of attention by making us more receptive to what exists beyond our immediate concerns.
Domains of connection
Spiritual connection can be experienced across several overlapping domains: self, body, others, community, nature, cosmos and sacred or ultimate reality. These domains need not be interpreted religiously. A secular person may experience profound connection through the body, relationships, nature, community or the cosmos without giving that experience a supernatural explanation.
-
Integration is what turns isolated insights, practices and experiences into development. A practice can remain a habit, a belief can remain ideology, and an intense experience can remain a memory. Transformation begins when different parts of a life - attention, emotion, meaning, identity, relationship and conduct - become reorganised into a more coherent way of living.
Transformation can be gradual or precipitated by a powerful experience, but intensity is not its measure. The more useful question is whether the person becomes more integrated, truthful, discerning, relational and capable of acting in accordance with what they have come to understand.
-
Spirituality does not only regulate, console or connect; it can also generate. Creativity changes not only what a person believes, but what they are able to imagine. It can turn crisis into symbol, grief into image, longing into practice, intuition into form and rupture into story.
This function appears in artistic practice, play, ritual, contemplative imagination and the capacity to envision alternative ways of living. Julia Cameron, Winnicott, Dissanayake and research on art-making all illuminate different aspects of this creative movement. Art is one pathway among several, rather than the organising principle of spirituality as a whole.
-
A healthy spiritual system should make people more autonomous, not more dependent. Empathy does not require obedience, and discipline does not require surrendering critical thought. A spiritual seeker should remain curious, mentally alert and capable of questioning teachers, institutions, interpretations and their own assumptions.
The relocation of spiritual authority towards lived experience can be emancipatory, but subjective certainty is not infallible. Autonomy therefore has to be joined to discernment: the ability to test claims, tolerate uncertainty, recognise manipulation, preserve boundaries and revise beliefs when evidence or experience requires it. A spiritual guide should become progressively less necessary, not more indispensable.
-
Taken together, these functions can support a more authentic existence through greater internal alignment. Here authenticity does not mean impulsively following whatever feels true. It means an increasing correspondence between attention, affect, values, identity, judgement and action.
At its best, spirituality does not tell a person who to become. It can help them become more present to their experience, more capable of understanding it, more connected to others, more discerning about what they believe and more able to live according to what they judge to be true and valuable.
The cost of growth and integrity
Personal and spiritual growth can be profoundly destabilising. Greater internal alignment does not necessarily make life easier. It may expose conflicts that were previously tolerated, hidden or rationalised. People may leave relationships that no longer allow them to live truthfully, distance themselves from toxic family dynamics, abandon established careers, change communities, move countries or choose a more uncertain path because the life they were living no longer corresponds to the person they are becoming.
There may also be a material cost. A person may accept financial insecurity in order to pursue meaningful work, refuse opportunities that conflict with their values or leave a secure profession for a vocation whose outcome is far less certain. Living in greater alignment may involve giving up status, income, approval or predictability.
At times the cost can be greater still. Someone who refuses to remain silent may find themselves in conflict with employers, institutions or political systems. Speaking truth to power can lead to exclusion, loss of employment, public attack, arrest, imprisonment or, in some countries, death. Activism, whistleblowing and resistance to injustice can be dangerous endeavours. Internal alignment may therefore become socially consequential when it produces an outward refusal to participate in falsehood, domination or harm.
Religious and spiritual traditions frequently describe profound transformation through images of death and rebirth. The chrysalis offers a related image: the previous form can no longer be inhabited, while the new one has not yet fully emerged. Such periods may involve grief, uncertainty, loneliness, fear and disorientation.
They may also hurt other people. Decisions necessary for one person's integrity can cause pain to partners, children, relatives, colleagues or communities. Authenticity therefore cannot mean following an inner imperative without regard for consequences. Growth does not cancel responsibility.
Nor should suffering, rupture or rebellion be romanticised. Pain is not proof of spiritual maturity. The relevant question is whether the transformation produces greater integration, truthfulness, discernment, responsibility, relational capacity and freedom. A difficult path may nevertheless become catalytic: a person who becomes less willing to tolerate falsehood or injustice can help alter relationships, institutions and communities.
When growth becomes crisis
Periods of personal or spiritual transformation are not always experienced as growth while they are happening. A spiritual crisis - often called a spiritual emergency by specialist support networks - may involve overwhelming experiences, rapid shifts in identity or worldview, loss of familiar meaning, difficulty functioning, fear, confusion, or a sense that one's previous life no longer holds together. Leaving or radically revising a religious tradition can produce a related crisis of identity, belonging, morality and meaning.
These experiences can overlap with mental-health difficulties. They should not automatically be assumed to be either purely spiritual or purely psychiatric. If someone is in immediate danger, suicidal, unable to care for themselves, severely sleep-deprived, or losing contact with consensual reality, urgent medical or mental-health support may be necessary.
Where to find support
Several specialist organisations provide information, peer support and/or professional referrals for people experiencing spiritual emergence, spiritual crisis or difficult-to-integrate spiritually transformative experiences.
International Spiritual Emergence Network (ISEN) – A global collaboration of non-profit spiritual-emergence networks. It provides information, practical guidance and routes to local support networks in different countries.
Spiritual Crisis Network (SCN), UK – A UK non-profit offering trained-volunteer email support, peer-support groups, grounding groups and support for families and carers.
Spiritual Emergence Network (SEN), USA – A US service offering free psychospiritual support and referrals, including a directory of professionals with experience of spiritual emergence and related difficulties.
ACISTE – The American Center for the Integration of Spiritually Transformative Experiences. It offers peer resources and a directory of certified mental-health professionals, spiritual guidance counsellors and coaches for people integrating intense spiritual experiences.
For religious deconstruction and faith transition
Britt Hartley / No Nonsense Spirituality – Hartley works specifically with religious deconstruction, nihilism recovery and secular spirituality, helping people rebuild meaning, identity, connection and spiritual depth after or outside religious dogma. Her coaching and educational resources are distinct from emergency or clinical mental-health care.
These external resources vary in scope, location and professional status. Listing them here is intended to help readers find an appropriate starting point; it is not a substitute for emergency or clinical care when that is required.
From personal growth to spiritual growth
Personal growth strengthens and integrates the self. Spiritual growth places that increasingly integrated self within a larger horizon of relation, responsibility and care. The outward movement does not replace the self or demand its erasure. It asks what an increasingly coherent person does with that coherence.
The moment personal transformation affects other people, spiritual growth ceases to be entirely private. Internal alignment begins to generate ethical consequences: how one loves, works, serves, uses power, participates in community, responds to injustice and understands obligations beyond immediate self-interest.
What does spirituality do for the community and society?
The social functions of spirituality hinge on the individual ones. Presence can become attentiveness to others; discernment can become resistance to manipulation; meaning can become purpose; connection can become community; internal alignment can become ethical action. The movement is from a more integrated self towards wider circles of responsibility.
-
Spirituality becomes socially significant when it changes conduct. Truthfulness, truth-seeking, empathy, compassion, tolerance, non-harm, responsibility, humility, discernment and care are not decorative ideals; they shape how a person acts when interests conflict and when power is unevenly distributed. Truth-seeking is epistemic: a willingness to examine and revise what one thinks is true. Truthfulness is ethical: a refusal to manipulate, conceal harm or pretend to know what one does not know.
-
The first social field is often the most intimate one: partners, family, friends, children, colleagues and other dependants. Spiritual growth can appear as greater capacity for empathy, reciprocity, boundaries, repair, truthful communication and non-harm. The self must be neither idolised nor erased. Mature relation requires enough selfhood to love without domination, submission or disappearance.
-
Service marks a shift from spirituality as personal benefit towards spirituality as contribution. Denita Benyshek's operational definition of the shaman is useful here because service to the community is one of its discriminating features. Durkheim likewise distinguishes religion from magic partly through the presence of a moral community. These perspectives suggest a practical ethical test: does spiritual authority enlarge responsibility beyond the ego-bound self, or mainly increase personal power, charisma, control or self-importance?
-
At the individual level, belonging is experienced as connection. At the social level, it becomes the creation and maintenance of communities: shared practices, mutual support, collective identities, rituals, meals, acts of care and forms of solidarity. Durkheim remains central here because he treated religion as a moral community and collective ritual as a force capable of binding individuals into a social whole.
-
An outward spiritual orientation may widen concern beyond one's immediate circle towards justice, human rights, solidarity and protection of the vulnerable. In some circumstances this takes the form of activism or resistance to institutional power. Speaking truth to power can carry serious personal costs, but it can also make the spiritually committed person a catalyst of social change.
-
Spiritual concern can extend beyond human relationships to animals, ecosystems, Earth and the wider more-than-human world. This may appear as ecological responsibility, reverence for life, restraint, reciprocity or a willingness to limit human use of the world. The important movement is the widening of moral attention beyond immediate human utility.
-
For some people, the widest horizon is God; for others it may be sacredness, cosmic consciousness, universal value, mystery, nature or ultimate reality. The metaphysical interpretation varies. The social and ethical significance lies in recognising that individual preference is not the only measure of value: some things are experienced as worthy of humility, reverence, truth-seeking, protection or restraint.
A final ethical hinge
The inward and outward movements belong together. Internal integration without wider responsibility can become self-absorption. Outward service without an integrated self can become self-erasure, dependency or moral grandiosity. Mature spirituality asks both how a person is becoming internally aligned and what that alignment makes possible in relation to others and the world.
The dark side of spirituality
The difficulty and personal cost of growth should never be used to legitimise abuse. Spiritual language can support development, but it can also conceal domination, exploitation, avoidance or dependency. Pain, sacrifice, destabilisation and surrender are not evidence in themselves that a teacher, community or practice is beneficial.
Warning signs include:
Charismatic leaders without accountability
Predators in spiritual clothing
Cultic communities
Spiritual bypassing
Miracle sellers
Purity and shame enforcers
Conspiracy prophets
Community narcissists
Boundary violators
Manipulative teachers or systems that create dependency
A spirituality that weakens truthfulness, discourages questioning, hides harm, demands obedience, creates dependency or manipulates followers fails the ethical test, however sacred its language or intense its experiences.
A spiritually serious way of life should cultivate presence, empathy, tolerance, compassion, non-harm, responsibility, truthfulness, service, discernment and autonomy. Difficulty may be part of growth, but harm must never be romanticised as proof of spiritual progress.